[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:15:39 -0400 |
>(Talking of which, it would be nice to be able to `pick -sub foo -within
>last:500' and have pick avoid a folder scan. I should be able to
>specify a subset of the folder to search within.)
Wait ... you can! pick takes a msgs argument. And I think it always could.
Regarding threads, I'm with you in that I'd be willing to get a simple
version with lousy performance just to get the UI ironed out before we
started doing fancy caching.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, norm, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Eric Gillespie, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, epg, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Eric Gillespie, 2013/04/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/06