nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again


From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:42:48 +0000

Hi Paul,

> > Right, but I was thinking we'd be doing:
> >
> >     isdigit((unsigned char) c);
> >
> > Which, AFAIK, is correct.
> >
> > Some people advocated (and I thought that's what Lyndon was talking
> > about):
> >
> >     isdigit((int)(unsigned char) c);

NetBSD's man page suggested the (int) because of a compiler bug, I think
it shouldn't be done...  That could be a very old bug.

> doesn't ansi c require the isdigit implementation to do that?

That's my understanding.

Cheers, Ralph.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]