nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] vfork()


From: Valdis . Kletnieks
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] vfork()
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:42:38 -0500

On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:01:44 PST, Lyndon Nerenberg said:

> Will replacing vfork() with fork() seriously impact nmh performance on
> any current UNIX variants?  (How many VAX users do we still have?)

fork() should be almost as cheap as vfork() on any system that has a
sane memory manager that does copy on write of the memory.

The linux manpage says there's a few slight differences between vfork()
and fork(), but nothing that should bother nmh.

We don't do any vfork() without an immediately following exec*() call, do we?

Attachment: pgpsMeWqIVxbz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]