nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] vfork()


From: Jeffrey Honig
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] vfork()
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:03:39 -0500

I gave up on VAXen when Paul Vixie gave up on the VAX port of BSD 4.4. (or was it 4.3 Reno?).

http://www.unixguide.net/unix/programming/1.1.2.shtml

http://www.unix.com/man-page/POSIX/3posix/vfork/

Both indicate that a POSIX compliant system should not have problems with that.

Thanks

Jeff

--
Jeffrey C. Honig <address@hidden>
http://www.honig.net/jch
GnuPG ID:14E29E13 <http://www.honig.net/jch/key.shtml>



On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 21:01, Lyndon Nerenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
Will replacing vfork() with fork() seriously impact nmh performance on any current UNIX variants?  (How many VAX users do we still have?)

--lyndon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Nih3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]