[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder"
From: |
Paul Vixie |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder" |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:58:45 +0000 |
> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:50:45 -0500
> From: address@hidden
>
> He has effectively typed "folder -recurse" already, the only differnce
> is the implicit /, which is non-intuitive, but I imagine meant to
> allow root to read his mail on machines where his home is /
well, sure. i'm not talking about correctness. i'm thinking that the
likelihood of someone typing "folders +" by mistake is much higher than
of typing "folders +" on purpose, and that in that less likely case the
user whose inbox directory is /inbox rather than /Mail/inbox or elsewhere
should be retrained to type "folders +/". thus my mention of least
astonishment.
- [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Mike O'Dell, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", belg4mit, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", belg4mit, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder",
Paul Vixie <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Mike O'Dell, 2011/02/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Paul Vixie, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Paul Vixie, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Jeffrey Honig, 2011/02/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] amusing bug in "folder", Peter Maydell, 2011/02/15