[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?)
|
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:57:55 -0500 |
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:04:15 +0100, markus schnalke said:
> Use a simple forwarding MTA (like nullmailer or ssmtp) instead.
Still more complicated than the one-line change to one file it took to change
the SMTP server in nmh. ;)
> For the user, shipping an own forwarder is not much different than
> providing a good tutorial on how to use an external program for the
> job. And if it is a problem, then this user is hardly a user of nmh
> anyway.
/me looks around and finds some files under ~/Mail that date to 1988...
pgp1jS61ii8TE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?),
Valdis . Kletnieks <=
should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), bergman, 2010/01/27
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/27
- [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Paul Fox, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/28