[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?)
|
From: |
Earl Hood |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:37:48 -0600 |
On January 28, 2010 at 11:04, markus schnalke wrote:
> Use a simple forwarding MTA (like nullmailer or ssmtp) instead.
Has anyone got either of these programs to work with nmh?
If so, can they share their configuration?
IIRC, ssmtp is a command-line replacement of sendmail vs
running as a daemon. MH/nmh communicate with sendmail via
the -bs option, something ssmtp does not support I believe.
I have not looked at nullmailer. First I've heard of it.
Does it support -bs mode of sendmail? Can it run as
a daemon and accept SMTP connections directly?
--ewh
should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), bergman, 2010/01/27
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/27
- [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Paul Fox, 2010/01/28