[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
|
From: |
Peter Maydell |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:20:20 +0100 |
David Levine wrote:
>I took a quick look at your dynamic allocation and it looks
>fine to me
It hasn't got to me yet, but I had a look at it in the list archive, and
this line of the patch:
+ i +- namebufsiz;
looks very dubious to me :-)
It's also got at least one unrelated change in it:
+ if(uprf(cp, "re:") || uprf(cp, "fw:"))
Other than that, it's not as invasive a patch as I'd feared it might be,
but I still vote to put it on ice until we have some decent tests.
-- PMM
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1), David Levine, 2008/10/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1), David Levine, 2008/10/23
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1), David Levine, 2008/10/23