[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development

From: Peter Galbraith
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:13:52 -0400

K Suominen <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'd like to see nmh survive as well, but I'm already one of those who
> migrated to another mail client (mutt) due to the increased amount of
> MIME mail.  It was the multipart PGP signatures that finally did it
> for me.

As a note of interest, it's likely that MH-E can address all your modern
needs and still use nmh.  Of course, it involves using Emacs too.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]