Re: [Monotone-devel] "throw usage(); " or "N(); " for argument checking?

[Markus Wanner]

Hi,

LeJacq, Jean Pierre wrote:
> Two considerations:
> 
> 1. N() can always be modified to provide an alternate implementation,
>    though I acknowledge that changing from throw semantics
>    would be problematic. For example, adding logging before the throw.

Isn't this exactly what Timothy proposes? Clearer separation of the two.

> 2. N() is not the best choice for handling this to begin with.

Agreed. Timothy proposed using "throw usage();" instead, which is
according to these two requests, AFAICT.

Regards

Markus Wanner