monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone Security


From: Daniel Carrera
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone Security
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:59:57 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)

Ethan Blanton wrote:
All security has to go in the *recipient*, because the
sender could be completely malicious.
Of course. Every check I have suggested has been server-side (recipient). The client (sender) is completely malicious.

The server isn't (necessarily) a trusted entity.  When you grok that,
perhaps your positions will change.  :-)

Well... there is some context here. We are talking about a specific attack. There are other attacks where the server is the bad guy (e.g. a malicious attacker with root access). The page I wrote also includes threats where the server is the bad guy.

Daniel.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]