Re: [Monotone-devel] more on commit without -b option

[Thomas Keller]

Richard Levitte schrieb:
> In message <address@hidden> on Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:31:54 +0200, Thomas Keller 
> <address@hidden> said:
>
> me> I guess the discussion just died off and I was not in the mood to
> me> pick the topic up myself and push it further. So if you have a
> me> better / working implementation, shoot.
>
> I was thinking that the best would be to pick up nvm.commit_without_-b
> and just change what's needed to go along the idea of a separate
> commit branch when 'mtn branch' and 'mtn commit' are used.  Would that
> be ok with you?

Yes, I very much second this proposal, because it also means very low 
impact on other commands which rely on a proper "branch" setting in 
_MTN/options. The only commands which do have to know about a new 
"commitbranch" option are actually mtn branch, mtn commit and mtn revert 
(and maybe mtn status to display the setting).

Thomas.

--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature