Re: [Monotone-devel] [PATCH] mtn publish

[Derek Scherger]

Nathaniel J. Smith wrote:
> I don't really have any opinion either way -- I've never felt that "rm
> -rf _MTN" was particularly onerous, but hey, if abstraction gives
> people fuzzies and keeps them warm at night...

One thought I've had along these lines is that perhaps "mtn detach" (aka 
rm -rf _MTN) and "mtn attach" (aka mtn checkout --no-files -r... -b...) 
might occasionally be useful.  With this, export would be equivalent to 
checkout + detach.

Obviously this is pretty minor it's just something that has crossed my mind.

Cheers,
Derek