monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Newbie questions


From: Robert Leftwich
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Newbie questions
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:34:37 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404)

Bruno Hertz wrote:
I for one don't understand where the fundamental mind shift would be,
maybe you want to explain from where you're coming.

Well, that would be Subversion (among others), whose status command does list new files, but it also scatters those darn .svn directories everywhere, polluting my nice, clean set-up :-)

But being myself
new to monotone either, I wouldn't expect the status command do
anything else than report on the files which are under revision
control. Especially when commands for extra info are available and
customized summaries can be scripted.

My mind set is that the status would be reporting on the current status of the working copy with respect to the vcs, not the other way around - hence the mind shift.


As to deleted files, afaik files under revision control which are
deleted are reported by the status command. So if you're implying you
want monotone to automatically keep track of any file added or deleted
in the working copy directory tree, I think you're heavily extending
the responsibilities most people would like to impose on an scm
system.

My expectations are coloured by exposure to other vcs' which do perform those tasks and I don't see it as heavily extending the responsibilities of the vcs, rather as an integral function.

The problem would be though, with this rule based, hooked ignore
mechanism, how to detect resp. communicate exact matches on
directories. That's presumably a design flaw, and the rule based
approach maybe should be complemented by a .cvsignore file analogue in
MT or something.

Or an ignore_dir() function that is called prior to entering a directory during traversal.

Robert





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]