[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?
From: |
Peter Simons |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version? |
Date: |
18 Dec 2004 15:11:03 +0100 |
graydon hoare writes:
> so rev 68d5d, which is my most recent head (merged with joel
> and msh's head), ought to be ok.
I got it and it seems to work fine. Thanks for the
explanation!
Just one minor nit: Was it really necessary to break
backwards compatibility in the "MT/options" file? Couldn't
the parser accept the old and new format (while writing the
new one) for a while?
Peter
- [Monotone-devel] Stable version?, Peter Simons, 2004/12/16
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, graydon hoare, 2004/12/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Matt Johnston, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Derek Scherger, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Nathaniel Smith, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/12/22
[Monotone-devel] Re: Stable version?,
Peter Simons <=
[Monotone-devel] Do .mt-attrs still work? (was: Stable version?), Peter Simons, 2004/12/18
[Monotone-devel] Re: Do .mt-attrs still work? (was: Stable version?), Bruce Stephens, 2004/12/18
[Monotone-devel] Re: Do .mt-attrs still work? (was: Stable version?), Peter Simons, 2004/12/18