[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Happy New Year [again]

From: Henry Nelson
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Happy New Year [again]
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:15:52 +0900 (JST)

> > What does "the only way" mean, putting in the complete *.po file?  What,
> > when and whose suggestion are you referring to?  I thought "maintainable"
> > only meant compilable to you.
> > 
> > > I already did that (the stubs in the tar file are from some trash on
> > 
> > "Stubs?"  There isn't a single _stub file_ in there!
> and cleaning the source, your complaint about the "over 30 minutes"
> download should also be eased a bit.

Didn't really intend to start a war, but I hope you realize that is
30 *additional* minutes of download time.  The stub file method had
been working; why it had to come to an end is beyond comprehension
(for _development_ code).  What is done with release packages is of
little concern to me, but it is a shame that development code is put
more and more out of the reach of people at the end of a slow line.


; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]