[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Suggestion for merging the libcurses and libslang code
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Suggestion for merging the libcurses and libslang code |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 19:05:10 -0500 (EST) |
> When Davis was posting to this news group, he pointed out that slcurses
> may not have the complete curses functionality wanted in lynx. But, I find
> it difficult to believe that libpdcurses, which compiles to 50 KB on my
> machine, could really have that much more functionality than libslang that
> compiles to 400 KB.
most of libslang is a language interpreter - with a subset of curses added.
(comparing the size of lynx built with curses and slang, the latter is about
2% smaller, so the curses subset in slang is probably comparable to pdcurses).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
lynx-dev Suggestion for merging the libcurses and libslang code, vtailor, 1999/11/08
Re: lynx-dev Suggestion for merging the libcurses and libslang code, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/08
Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:address@hidden too much unencripted info, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/08
Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:address@hidden too much unencripted info, Larry W. Virden, 1999/11/08