[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0
From: |
Nelson Henry Eric |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:07:07 +0900 (JST) |
> > > Speaking of C, maybe Lynx 3.0 should move to a more object-oriented
> > > approach? I don't know if that would be a good idea - what do people
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Are you guys talking about rewriting Lynx in some OO language? Rewriting
> parts of Lynx with a new design philosophy?
N - O, no. Only a change in that direction for newly added code. But
who am I to talk since I haven't contributed a scrap of code.
__Henry
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, T.E.Dickey, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, T.E.Dickey, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Al Gilman, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), William Denton, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Al Gilman, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Andrew Kuchling, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), T.E.Dickey, 1997/02/28
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, Matt Ackeret, 1997/02/27
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0,
Nelson Henry Eric <=
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/02/27
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, David Combs, 1997/02/27