Re: LYNX-DEV Re: DOS, DOS and Windows

[Doug Lawson]

On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Wayne Buttles wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Doug Lawson wrote:
> > 
> > > One thing I missed about compiling Lynx code (actually most Un*x code) 
> > > with Borland C 3.1 (not sure about other versions) is 0 != NULL.  
> > 
> > It's been a while since I used Borland 3.anything but I don't remember 
> > having that problem...............
> 
> Umm, maybe it is a case of me not quite understanding the real problem. 
> Here is a sample from HTTP.c (in HTML_FORM): 
> 
> source = HTAnchor_findChildAndLink(me->node_anchor, 0, action, 0); 
> 
> Needed to be:
> 
> source = HTAnchor_findChildAndLink(me->node_anchor, NULL, action, NULL); 

Well, that would indicate that the compiler is not compliant.  Obviously 
NULL is #defined to something other than 0.  Like I said, it's been some 
time since I used BC3.x .

Doug


;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;