[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE : [lwip-users] Status of IPv6
From: |
Frédéric BERNON |
Subject: |
RE : [lwip-users] Status of IPv6 |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:58:31 +0200 |
Simon is right (you can also see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/2007-04/msg00112.html).
I sent an email last month to know if some peoples use explicitly IPv6 in their
projects (even other than lwIP). But no answers :(
Currently, my entreprise as decide to wait one year more before decide if we do
something or not for IPv6 support. But, in France, it doesn't seems really
necessary for the moment... I don't know for other countrys. Perhaps that's why
IPv6 doesn't have any real active developer yet...
====================================
Frédéric BERNON
HYMATOM SA
Chef de projet informatique
Microsoft Certified Professional
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44
Email : address@hidden
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr
====================================
P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Goldschmidt Simon
Envoyé : mardi 24 juillet 2007 08:17
À : Mailing list for lwIP users
Objet : RE: [lwip-users] Status of IPv6
> What is the current state of IPv6 as it exists in the CVS HEAD? It
> looks like it hasn't been touched in a really long time.
That is certainly true. There have been some fixes here and there: As we
changed IPv4, we did some obvious changes to IPv6, too, but I don't think it
has ever been really tested lately.
> Did it ever work? Where did it come from? Does it work?
I really don't know. The downside is that you can compile lwIP either for IPv4
_or_ for IPv6, you can't use both in one application.
Simon
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Frédéric BERNON.vcf
Description: Frédéric BERNON.vcf
- RE : [lwip-users] Status of IPv6,
Frédéric BERNON <=