[lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning

[Kieran Mansley]

Follow-up Comment #14, task #6827 (project lwip):

Sounds like a good compromise.  I'm a little concerned at the moment at the
number of optional bits of code we're adding to lwIP.  This isn't the place
to discuss it, but we risk ending up with a lot of
not-regularly-tested/unused code, and (more) confused users. 

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6827>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/