Re: [lmi] Switch to using C++11 uniform initialization in the ctor initializer lists?

[Greg Chicares]

On 2018-08-27 23:17, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:06:23 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> GC> - "cardinality" as the first argument of a two-argument vector::vector
> GC> call strongly suggests it's the C++98 ctor.
> 
>  Sorry, but how? I totally misread this as something else during the first
> pass.

Is there a synonym that would make it more clear? E.g.:

  :allowed_(number_of_enumerators_in_the_enumeration, true)

  :allowed_(size_of_the_vector_we_are_constructing, true)

Or is there some other way to signal that we're passing a size argument? E.g.:

  :allowed_((lmi::ssize_t)cardinality_of_the_enumeration, true)