[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs... |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:43:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Hi Torsten,
I withdraw my vote for 3. When comparing your recent pdfs, I join
Werner's statement. The bb and bbb glyphs just look too wide (4) or too
thin/too overlapping (3) otherwise.
I prefer the condensed form (version 2).
Cheers,
Joram
Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs..., Torsten Hämmerle, 2018/03/14