[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Section repeat
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: Section repeat |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Feb 2017 23:02:35 +0100 |
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 22:41, Flaming Hakama by Elaine <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I'd say, in general, you need as many alternatives as there is unique
> material.
>
> Only 1 & 3 are the same, so you can combine those.
> 2 and 4 differ in that 2 needs a repeat barline at the end of the measures,
> you need one alternative each.
>
> This means three alternatives:
> 1 & 3
> 2
> 4
>
> Which is to say, I agree with how you did it in the second half of your
> example.
Indeed, combining 2 & 4 looked wrong. It is a curious example in that the music
lines of these are exactly the same, including the binding note at the end.
- Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Chris Yate, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Chris Yate, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Chris Yate, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, David Wright, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
Re: Section repeat, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2017/02/03