[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Section repeat
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: Section repeat |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:56:40 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu 02 Feb 2017 at 20:29:49 (+0100), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 2 Feb 2017, at 19:35, Chris Yate <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >> > I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for each
> >> > alternative, and expect a repeat symbol at the end of any section that
> >> > needed it.
> >> >
> >> > Of course you might put labelling like "1, 3", "2", "4" as required.
> >>
> >> Yes, that is one. Another might be to indicate that the whole section is
> >> to be repeated by some mark at the beginning like "2x", or perhaps Dal
> >> Segno marks.
> >
> > It depends how long the section is. D.S. marks are typically confusing for
> > short sections.
>
> I felt so, too.
>
> > "3x" still requires the repeat bar lines
>
> Yes, the idea was to just add "2x" to a repeat with two alternatives. How
> would that look, in your view?
Isn't there a danger that the "2x" will be seem as merely a redundant
reinforcement of an ordinary repeat unless you mark the end of the
second alternative.
> Otherwise, I used the "1, 3", "2", "4" variation, which looks fine.
How good it looks might depend on the relative scale of the repeated
section and the alternatives.
Cheers,
David.
repeats.png
Description: PNG image
- Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Chris Yate, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Chris Yate, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Chris Yate, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
- Re: Section repeat,
David Wright <=
- Re: Section repeat, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/02
Re: Section repeat, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2017/02/03