[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OOoLilyPond
From: |
Wols Lists |
Subject: |
Re: OOoLilyPond |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:07:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote:
>> I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked,
>> >Oolilypond did not make any use of it.
> Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to
> maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a
> huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word.
Just make sure you look in the right place ... :-)
I follow the LO dev mailing list, and last I remember (probably mid last
year) it was a bit of a mess with some filters importing vectors
unchanged, and other filters converting it to internal LO structures.
And it was a bit of a russian roulette which one was applied to your file.
I know the aim was to clean it up, and it was clear that stuff imported
should NOT be converted unless/until the user tried to edit it, but I
don't know where that went.
(Oh, and it should be renamed LO-lilypond, seeing as OO is - to all
intents and purposes nowadays - dead in the water.)
Cheers,
Wol
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Noeck, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, David Kastrup, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond,
Wols Lists <=
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Wols Lists, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Python LiLily (was: OOoLilyPond), Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Klaus Blum, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Klaus Blum, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Wols Lists, 2017/01/02