[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changing voice order...
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Changing voice order... |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:07:10 -0400 |
On Oct 28, 2016, at 03:51 , David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> At any rate, does that mean that you are fine with
>
> << \sopranoI \\ \alto \\ \sopranoII >>
>
> and
>
> << \sopranoI \\ \altoII \\ \sopranoII \\ \altoI >>
>
> because that is what we currently have?
Until I read this thread, I didn’t know that more than two voices were
supported, so it hasn’t inconvenienced me; however, it does seem
counterintuitive when you write them that way.
—
Dan
Re: Changing voice order..., Carl Sorensen, 2016/10/27
Re: Changing voice order..., lilypond, 2016/10/27
RE: Changing voice order..., Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/10/27
- Re: Changing voice order..., David Kastrup, 2016/10/27
- RE: Changing voice order..., Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/10/27
- Re: Changing voice order..., David Kastrup, 2016/10/27
- RE: Changing voice order..., Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/10/27
- Re: Changing voice order..., David Kastrup, 2016/10/27
- RE: Changing voice order..., Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/10/27