[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Augmentation dot positioning
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Augmentation dot positioning |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:50:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.7.160722 |
On 9/19/16 2:53 AM, "Chris Yate" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Looking at the results, I suspect the positioning algorithm should try to
>place dots on the space-notes first, then work the line-notes around them.
>
>
>Additionally, chord-dots-limit might be used to limit how far away the
>dots can be 'shifted' during the calculation process, rather than pruning
>the excess dots after the fact.
>
>
>I'm not sure how best to change the rather complicated calc_positioning
>function to achieve that (and more importantly have to go to work now!)
>:-)
>
I agree with all of these points, and am working on an improved algorithm.
Once I get the algorithm solidified, I know how to implement it.
But I haven't got the algorithm solidified yet.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, (continued)
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/18
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/18
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/18
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/18
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/18
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/19
- Message not available
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/19
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/18
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Paul, 2016/09/15