|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:23:04 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 |
Am 13.01.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Urs
Liska:
Hi all, one more beaming question, given the following input \relative a' { \time 6/8 \set strictBeatBeaming = ##t a8.. a32 a16 a } which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or the modified? Would it make sense to add a beaming option (e.g. "strictBeatBeamingNonFlagSide") so the user can choose? Note that I think this is actually the difference between subdivideBeams being ##t or ##f. Currently LilyPond produces the second rendering from my previous post, regardless of subdivisions or not. So I'd say *with* strictBeatBeaming *and* subdivided beams the non-flag side should have its stems governed by the rhythmic position of the subdivision while with strictBeatBeaming and *no* subdivisions it should have the beam number of the following stem. Objections? Urs Best Urs |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |