[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we really offer the future?
From: |
Michael Hendry |
Subject: |
Re: Do we really offer the future? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:06:13 +0100 |
> On 23 Apr 2015, at 01:48, Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen (et al.)
>
>> anyway I tried a few examples and used %1a %2a etc for measures and used the
>> bar check (|) as an end
>> eg.
>> %1a
>> music |
>
This would be reliant on meticulous use of of the “%NNNa" and “|” pairs to
delineate the beginning and end of the bar, which might prove to be a tall
order - perhaps requiring a syntax-testing script to pick up errors before
running sed?
Offended by the ragged line ends after editing, and feeling the OCD-sufferer’s
need to have the bar checks neatly lined up at the end of the line, I routinely
put the bar checks at the _beginnings_ of the bars, thus...
| a4 b c d
| a8 b c d e f g a
| a16 b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b
...instead of...
a4 b c d |
a8 b c d e f g a |
a16 b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b |
...or this...
a4 b c d |
a8 b c d e f g a |
a16 b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b |
…which has the bar checks neatly lined up using tab characters as I type this
email, but will probably come out with a ragged edge when you receive it!
I’m not sure whether sed can omit text up to but not including the second
delimiter.
Michael
> I use
>
> music | % 1
>
> Would sed still work?
>
>> worked almost every time, only problem I had was if I had to fix the octave
>
> Yet another reason to deprecate \relative, which I now avoid like the plague.
> (Unfortunately, I was suckered into using it when I started using Lilypond
> over a decade ago, so all my legacy code is in \relative mode. Using
> Frescobaldi, I’m slowly converting all my old code to absolute mode.)
>
> Cheers,
> Kieren.
> ________________________________
>
> Kieren MacMillan, composer
> ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
> ‣ email: address@hidden
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: What is the problem with "\relative"? (Was: Do we really offer the future?), (continued)
- Re: What is the problem with "\relative"? (Was: Do we really offer the future?), Johan Vromans, 2015/04/25
- Re: What is the problem with "\relative"? (Was: Do we really offer the future?), Simon Albrecht, 2015/04/25
- Re: What is the problem with "\relative"? (Was: Do we really offer the future?), Ali Cuota, 2015/04/25
- Re: What is the problem with "\relative"? (Was: Do we really offer the future?), address@hidden, 2015/04/25
- Re: What is the problem with "\relative"? (Was: Do we really offer the future?), Noeck, 2015/04/25
- Re: What is the problem with "\relative"? (Was: Do we really offer the future?), Ali Cuota, 2015/04/25
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Shane Brandes, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/23
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Federico Bruni, 2015/04/23
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Calixte Faure, 2015/04/23
- Re: Do we really offer the future?,
Michael Hendry <=
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Keith OHara, 2015/04/26
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, H. S. Teoh, 2015/04/26
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/26
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, H. S. Teoh, 2015/04/26
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Michael Hendry, 2015/04/26
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Simon Albrecht, 2015/04/26
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Urs Liska, 2015/04/26
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Michael Hendry, 2015/04/27
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Urs Liska, 2015/04/27
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Johan Vromans, 2015/04/26