|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Grand Advanced Stylesheet Project (GASP) |
Date: | Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:06:30 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
Am 19.01.2015 um 14:25 schrieb tisimst:
Urs, et. al., I think it is about both, and you're probably right that this isn't sufficiently differentiated in the discussion. My understanding of the library would be more towards the stylesheet part. And these stylesheets should be as modular as possible, either through what I suggested as a "namespace" directory structure or by making it possible to include individual modules. Take the new fonts, for example. Different fonts tend to call for modifications in the output defaults, e.g. line-thicknesses or font-size overrides etc. And it would be great if we had a consistent way to include building independently blocks like: 1. page size 2. score type 3. music font 4. individual customizations or 1. page size 2. score type 3. "publisher" (with "publisher" referring either to a real publishing house or to an imaginary style sheet)
Hm, that makes sense too. But maybe it would still be a good idea to provide templates as a library, i.e. something that has to be downloaded separately but which can be done so easily. There are some preliminary thoughts about a "Grand Library Infrastructure Project" (to refer to the threads title), and this would fit into this perfectly. An editor like Frescobaldi could then *support* such a template (and a style sheet) library instead of incorporating itself. I think it would be a good idea not to tie such important enhancements to a single editing environment. Urs
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |