[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optical spacing -- no more?
From: |
Brian Barker |
Subject: |
Re: Optical spacing -- no more? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:50:43 +0100 |
At 16:07 11/07/2014 +0006, Abraham Lee wrote:
Maybe just me, but I don't really like the look of that. I see the
stems are equidistant, but, at least to me, I feel like it's not
balanced and it makes the notehead spacing a little awkward... I'd
still rather see the default behavior. But we all can have our
preferences :) Not sure if either is "correct".
For what it's worth, Elaine Gould agrees, saying (on p. 41);
In certain cases, spacing should be adjusted to create an illusion
of evenness. Adjacent stems 'back to back' can otherwise look too
close together. Notes with stems away from each other can look too far apart.
Brian Barker
Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Abraham Lee, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Abraham Lee, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Kastrup, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Abraham Lee, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?,
Brian Barker <=
- Message not available
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/11