[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)? |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 09:32:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Marc Hohl <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Am 06.03.2014 18:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> So I'm now down to
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and that's probably long enough I should spend on this distraction.
>>
>> What about
>>
>> << { r8 a' d e f\3 a\2 | <f\3 a\2 d\1>2\arpeggio } \\
>> { d,2.~ | d2 } >> r4
>>
>> for the final bars? The position change from the first to the tenth
>> fret remains the same but starts earlier and gives a nice line to
>> the topmost note of the final arpeggiated chord.
>>
>> Ok, just a nitpick ...
>
> Now that I was allowed to make a noise again, I checked that version.
> The basic idea is good. However, the arpeggio becomes redundant: there
> is no need to strike the notes again. If one did so, one better would
> restrike the bass note as well, but I think it's better just keeping
> them all on sustain without further notice.
>
> Definitely an improvement. I'll just have to cast this into code.
Not that hard. Except that with
<< { \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
r8 a' d e f\3~ a\2~ | <f a d>2 } \\
{ d,2.~ | d2 }
>> r4
the string indication on the first f is not really a mere matter of
style any more. So I probably should print it in the score. Which is a
nuisance as I suppressed the numbers staff-wide so far.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, (continued)
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, John Link, 2014/03/06
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/06
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, John Link, 2014/03/06
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/06
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/06
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Kevin Tough, 2014/03/07
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/07
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/03/07
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Marc Hohl, 2014/03/07
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/08
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Marc Hohl, 2014/03/08
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/08
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Marc Hohl, 2014/03/08
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/08
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Marc Hohl, 2014/03/06
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/06
- Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Johan Vromans, 2014/03/06
Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Marc Hohl, 2014/03/05
Re: Is this reasonable/playable (guitar)?, Johan Vromans, 2014/03/06