[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:37:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 |
Hi
Just a quick but honest thank you from my side to all of you for
improving the out-of-the-box quality, tweaking-possibilities (e.g.
\shape) and simplifications for users (e.g. the.dot.syntax instead of #')!
I think, the blog posts show that there is still room for improvements
to the automatic typesetting (I am thinking about vertical and
horizontal spacing, the latter especially for triplets and many other
points Janek mentioned). I would be interested, if you could classify
the tweaks needed for the Fried songs?
Something like: note-spacing, default slurs, broken slurs, very special
slurs, lyrics shifts, … How many did you need for every kind? And how
many could (in principle) be solved by a more clever automatic behaviour
(just a rough guess)?
The possibility to enter tweaks separately from the music input sounds
very good.
Cheers,
Joram
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, (continued)
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/11/26
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/26
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, Urs Liska, 2013/11/26
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, David Kastrup, 2013/11/26
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/26
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing,
Noeck <=
- Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/27
Re: Discussion: automatic engraving and single-source publishing, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/26