[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mea máxima culpa
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: mea máxima culpa |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:22:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tim Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Maybe the reply-to header of the digest should not even point to the
>> list? Replying to a digest makes no sense with regard to message
>> threading anyway.
>
> I have strong opinions about this, in part because I participate in
> another mailing list that uses the "no-reply" trick for the digest.
>
> In my opinion, you are proposing a government approach here: you are
> proposing legislative action to solve a problem that only occurs rarely,
> and when it does occur is easily solved through education. I don't
> think you need to make it harder for those of us who have learned the
> lesson, just because someone does something inappropriate once every few
> months.
How does it make it harder? As I said, replying to a digest makes no
sense with regard to message threading anyway.
--
David Kastrup
- mea máxima culpa, Patrick or Cynthia Karl, 2013/09/11
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Tim Roberts, 2013/09/11
- Re: mea máxima culpa,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Tim Roberts, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, James Harkins, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12