[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:08:05 +0100 (CET) |
> If the line breaking isn't expected to change, i think that the most
> reliable solution would be to explicitely set staff distance in this
> particular system.
Thanks for the suggestion, but I think that such a severe collision
should be fixed independently of the final layout. I'm still waiting
for Mike's answer w.r.t. shifting up the skyline by inserting some
padding.
Werner
- collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13