[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:19:17 +0100 |
Hi Werner,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> consider this real-life example (omitting the unimportant voices).
> [..]
>
> There is an ugly clash between the two beams. Due to the cross-staff
> beam, this is sort-of expected.
>
> What can I do to improve the formatting?
If the line breaking isn't expected to change, i think that the most
reliable solution would be to explicitely set staff distance in this
particular system. You have to put this override at the musical
moment when the system begins (in any stave). If you have more than
two staves, you have to specify remaining distances.
\overrideProperty #"Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn"
#'line-break-system-details #'((alignment-distances . (12)))
(this is the old syntax, i haven't upgraded to dot-separated lists yet)
hth,
Janek
- collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13