Re: duration and pitch in a function

[jakob lund]

2011/12/9 Matthew Collett <address@hidden>:
>
> On 9/12/2011, at 2:27 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>> On 8/12/2011, at 10:48 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please, *never*, *never*, *never* send a "courtesy copy" of a public
>>>> answer as a private mail when answering on a mailing list unless you
>>>> have been _explicitly_ asked to provide such a copy.
>>>
>>> Normally I'd agree with you, but in fairness to Paolo I observe that
>>> this is the only mailing list I am or ever have been a member of in
>>> which the default behaviour is to reply to the sender (only) rather
>>> than to the list.  I have in consequence more than once
>>> unintentionally sent a separate "courtesy copy" message.
>>
>> You arae confusing a _separate_ "courtesy copy", namely one for which
>> the _only_ recipient in the headers is the person you are replying to,
>> with _including_ the intended recipient in the list of recipients of the
>> _same_ mail.
>
> No, I am not: a separate message is what I said, and what I meant.  Because 
> the list reply defaults to the sender _only_, unless I remember explicitly to 
> choose "Reply All" (which I otherwise rarely use) any message I mean to send 
> to the list goes instead to just the individual.  I then have to send a 
> separate copy to the list (only), making my first reply retrospectively and 
> unintentionally a "courtesy copy".  The last occasion that happened was just 
> yesterday.  And as I said, I do not have this problem with any other mailing 
> list.

+1

.. Sorry Matt, I did it again... Jakob.
>
> Best wishes,
> Matthew
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user