[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond lobbying?
From: |
Joseph Wakeling |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
On 08/18/2011 03:21 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> My original question still stands, though. I think that it is worth it for a
> community of users of any free software (where I mean free in every sense of
> the term) to be active in contacting organizations whose rules are hostile to
> the free usage of software. It helps organizations learn about free software
> (both the software itself and the mentality of freedom behind the software),
> thereby encouraging these organizations to adopt policies that are conducive
> to this type of free-ness / free-dom.
One of the arguments you can use in this case is how Lilypond is a much
friendlier option for blind composers -- we have a list member who uses
it for precisely this reason.
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Francois Planiol, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Robert Schmaus, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Urs Liska, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/19
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Francois Planiol, 2011/08/19
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/19
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2011/08/19
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Francois Planiol, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Francois Planiol, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?,
Joseph Wakeling <=
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Colin Campbell, 2011/08/18
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Graham Percival, 2011/08/18
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/20
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Craig, 2011/08/18
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Robert Schmaus, 2011/08/25