[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion s
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite) |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:40:55 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 07:12:59PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> However, there is also a practical problem: How do you check the
> quality of your export? There are so many things in the MusicXML
> "specification" that are left unclear, and the typical advice on
> the MusicXML mailing list is "Just check what Finale does"...
That's rubbish. Remind anybody of microsoft's "office docuement
standard" ?
MusicXML isn't a standard at all. If you have to say "umm, dunno,
look at what this other piece of software does", it's not a
standard. Period.
(unless you buy into microsoft's "whatever internet explorer does
is the standard" definition of a standard, which totally warps the
original intention of the term)
> So, if you want to do serious work on MusicXML, you'll have to
> buy a copy of finale for several hundred $$$ (well, Michael Good
> suggested to buy one of the stripped-down version for "only"
> 100$ ...... However, these versions don't support MusicXML 2.0,
> so they don t really help).
Wow! That's pretty sleazy.
Is their company really *that* bad that they need to ask
open-source developers to buy several-hundred-dollar software just
to work on interaction between the two?
I see why nobody wants to work on musicxml export. I mean, if
even finale's company isn't interested in "playing nice", then why
on earth should other programmers jump through hoops to work on
musicxml?!?
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, (continued)
- Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, Kirill, 2010/02/01
- Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, Kirill, 2010/02/02
- Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, Michael Good, 2010/02/03
- Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, Kirill, 2010/02/03
- Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/02/04
- Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/02/06
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Graham Percival, 2010/02/06
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/02/07
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite),
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/02/07
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/02/08
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Graham Percival, 2010/02/08
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/02/08
- Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite), Jack Cooper, 2010/02/08
Re:New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, Stefan Thomas, 2010/02/04
Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite, Michael Good, 2010/02/04