[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date in footer?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: date in footer? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:51:08 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/4/26 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>
> > This is easily solved; the python script that copies from
> > input/new/ to input/lsr/ should add a "This snippet only works in
> > 2.13"; that way, the LSR editor can easily see such snippets from
> > browsing the docs.
>
> We already have a comment which says where the snippets come from,
> even if it doesn't explain why a particular example has been generated
> from input/new. If we're going to expand on this message, I'd like it
> to be based on \version, i.e., "This snippet only works from version
> x.y.z".
+1
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: date in footer?, (continued)
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Chip, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/04/23