[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lighter appearance
From: |
Carl D. Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Lighter appearance |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:47:08 -0700 |
On 11/15/08 4:32 AM, "Johan Vromans" <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Carl D. Sorensen" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I set that exact line in LilyPond 2.11.64. I needed to do some manual
>> beaming to get the same beaming as in the top line.
>
> Interesting. When I try:
>
> \relative c' {
> \time 6/8
> r4 a8 d e f | e d4 ~ d4. |
> r4 r16 g,16 e'8 g e16 d | c8. ( a16 g8 ~ g8. ) r16 r8 |
> }
>
> the beaming comes out exactly as in the original sample.
>
Ahh, that's the difference. I set it as 3/4, instead of 6/8.
>> The note spacing in Johan's sample is dramatically different (worse)
>> than in my LilyPond output.
>
> This is a cut-out from a larger score, it was not typeset separately.
> The notes have lyrics that account for the large gap between the
> sixteenth and eighth notes. The Sibelius score (second line), also a
> cut-out, did not have the lyrics.
>
Oh -- the lyrics gave the bad spacing. Thanks for the explanation.
Carl
Re: Lighter appearance, David Rogers, 2008/11/17
Re: Lighter appearance, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2008/11/18
Re: Lighter appearance, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2008/11/18