lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rests position in otherwise empty measure.txt


From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: rests position in otherwise empty measure.txt
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 22:02:49 +0100

Bill

I don't really know the answer to your question, whether the LP default positioning for whole measure rests in polyphonic music follows standard typesetting practice, although I know it was always the intention to do so. So I'm copying this to the -user list to prompt comment from those more knowledgeable than I about such things.

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Mooney" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: rests position in otherwise empty measure.txt


Hi Trevor,
Your solution, and one other slightly different one I found in an earlier post, fixes the positioning 'problem' for whole measure rests but doesn't affect the smaller rests (obviously!). I suppose what I'm asking is, when one has two voices on a single staff is it standard notation practice for the WMRs to be positioned the way LP defaults. My 'client' doesn't like the LP way, unfortunately, hence my attempts at a general workaround.

Thank you for your help
Bill






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]