[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scheme question on strict substitution
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Scheme question on strict substitution |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:47:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
Mats Bengtsson escreveu:
>> OK, thank you, that's very clear. That fact, for any given keyword,
>> would tell a user immediately whether (s)he could just write a macro or
>> would be forced to define a function for some expression involving the
>> keyword.
>>
>> Is the information
>> (1) number of arguments
>> or preferably
>> (2) the syntax
>> documented explicitly anywhere for all keywords?
>>
> As already said, this is not available in the current manual and one
> problem is that
> this would still just tell a small part of the full syntax. Another
This should be rather easy to add to the manual. I believe some of the
functions already have doc strings. It shouldn't be too hard to
extract them in dump them into the program reference. A neat task for
a scheme hacker... Nicolas?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution, (continued)
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/11/29
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution, stk, 2006/11/30
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/11/30
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution, stk, 2006/11/30
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/11/30
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution, stk, 2006/11/30
- Re: Scheme question on strict substitution,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=