|
From: | Stephen Torri |
Subject: | Re: Lilypond missing note head files |
Date: | Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:33:46 -0600 |
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 09:19 +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > It's certainly not a FAQ, I cannot recall having seen this very problem > before. However, you can get much more help from the mailing list if you > - Tell what operating system you use Gentoo Linux (2005.1) > - Tell how you installed LilyPond (from some precompiled package or by > compiling it yourself) Compiled myself from the lilypond-2.6.5.tar.gz I got from the lilypond website. > - Include the output of lilypond --verbose test.ly Attached. > By the way, you should expect problems (but not the problems shown > below) if your gs version is too old. Using eps ghostscript 7.07. This is what is installed at present with a default Gentoo installation. I made no change from this when I installed my version of the distribution. In the ebuild files for any package that depends on ghostscript I find a virtual/ghostscript which I believe means that any ghostscript installation will suffice. I got the same errors switching to ghoscript-gnu (8.16) so I uninstalled my old copy of lilypond, ran ./configure --prefix=usr (no warnings this time), rebuilt and reinstalled it. I still get the same errors (ghostscript_gnu_8_16.log) So I unmasked mftrace in the Gentoo portage system and upgraded to it. After which I uninstalled lilypond, ran ./configure --prefix=/usr, rebuilt and reinstalled. Only by doing the last step was I am to compile my test.ly without errors. I hope the attached information helps.
test.log
Description: Output using eps ghostscript 7.07 & mftrace 1.1.16
ghostscript_gnu_8_16.log
Description: Output using ghostscript-gnu-8.16 & mftrace-1.1.16
ghostscript_gnu_8_16_mftrace_1_1_17.log
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |