[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:43:08 +0100 |
2016-11-23 9:23 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite <address@hidden>:
>
> BTW the results are promising, with my latest patchset the UTF-8
> characters should be rendered fine. The images are not pixel perfect
> because when using guile-2.0 the floating point numbers in the
> postscript output are formatted slightly differently and that results
> in different positioning of the symbols on the score, but I haven't
> looked deeply into that.
I finally finished a complete 'make doc' successfully.
Up to now I didn't notice any serious issue
The only minor thingy so far:
/input/regression/utf-8.ly changed spacing/line.break
Not related to the current guile2-problem, because it happens in the
2.19.51-docs as well:
(1)
The Japanese docs always display a Yen-sign instead of the backslash
in the browser, although copying it into a utf-8-aware editor works
well.
See attached screenshot.
Masamichi-San cc-ed.
(2)
/input/regression/keys.ly
looks bad
Cheers,
Harm
notation-ASCII-ja.png
Description: PNG image
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/24
- RE: guile-2.0 and debian, Andrew Bernard, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Pirotte, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Masamichi Hosoda, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/19