[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:42 +0100 |
2016-11-23 15:52 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni <address@hidden>:
> Il giorno mer 23 nov 2016 alle 15:10, Antonio Ospite <address@hidden> ha
> scritto:
>>
>> Ah I didn't know about lilydev (https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDev).
>>
>> Updating it to Debian testing aka Stretch (the _next_ Debian stable
>> release) will expose people to guile-2.0.13.
>>
>> Federico, AFAICT the current 4.1 works fine for guile-1.8 (FTR Debian
>> stable has both 1.8.8 and 2.0.11, but lilydev only provides the former),
>> maybe if you release a version based on Stretch use 5.0 as version
>> number to make it easier to differentiate between the two.
>
>
> I prefer waiting for the release of Stretch, then I'll use 5.0 as version
> number, as you suggest.
> Until then I'd rather use pinning for this package.
>
>>
>> BTW for those who don't want to run a full virtual machine, a
>> lightweight lilydev container can be created and launched with the
>> attached script.
>
>
> Nice, thanks
>
Currently it seems I'm the only one being able to test Antonio's patches.
This is not exactly optimal.
I 'm always running short of time, so I _only_ test, meaning I've not
the time to think about "what's done", "why", "what are the
consequences", etc. Sometimes I test even without having a look _what_
I'm testing :(
I hope I can give him some feedback, but more people participating is
surely preferable.
Having a LilyDev with guile 2.0.12/13 may help.
So, I pretty much desire a guile2.10.12/13-LilyDev
Antonios container-script may help as well, but I think more people
are familiar with our LilyDev already.
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Message not available
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Paul, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Knut Petersen, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, karl, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/25