[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:07:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Antonio Ospite <address@hidden> writes:
> For instance if David, or someone else, could confirm that patch 0005
> [1] actually makes sense I would propose it for inclusion in lilypond.
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>
> [1]
> https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guile2/0005-Fix-ending-the-dynamic-extent-in-Text_interface-inte.patch
[Forehead-slap] Looks like the right thing to do but it seems like
moving it the scm_dynwind_end call before anything else is done might be
better since non_fatal_error might cause a fatal error (depending on
command line options) and I am not completely sure that a non-local C++
exit will properly count as a non-local Scheme exit according to
scm_dynwind_end's documentation.
It's a non-brainer so I might just push a fix without further notice if
it's ok with you that I'm stealing your credit in that manner. If it's
not ok, I'll get your patch and commit message and do that change with
you as author.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/15
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/17