[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 01:15:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
> Short update:
> I managed to get guile 2.0.13 and guile-2.0-dev for 2.0.13 (grabed it
> from Zesty Zapus which will be Ubuntu 17.04)
> Successful make with all of Antonios patches (didn't try make doc so far).
>
> Though, _every_ compilation of a .ly will cause a gs-error.
>
> Even for { c1 } I get:
>
> lilypond-git atest-40.ly
> GNU LilyPond 2.19.51
> Processing `atest-40.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Finding the ideal number of pages...
> Fitting music on 1 page...
> Drawing systems...
> Layout output to `/tmp/lilypond-6s1XBB'...
> Converting to `atest-40.pdf'...
> warning: `(gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595,28
> -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841,89 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
> -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=atest-40.pdf -c.setpdfwrite
> -f/tmp/lilypond-6s1XBB)' failed (256)
>
> fatal error: failed files: "atest-40.ly"
>
> Will try to continue tomorrow, too late today.
That one is going to be another (re)encoding error, this time when
writing PostScript. It may or may not be a different problem than the
ones I experienced: Masamichi-san fairly recently made some changes to
font handling that also were concerned with byte transparency.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/15
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/17