Re: Doc: Appendix - Articulations and Ornamentation - part 3 (issue 127000043 by address@hidden)

[tdanielsmusic]

Suggested changes to index entries and spotted a
couple of typos.  Might it be better to reorder the
entries more logically, so, for example, the base
instrument is immediately followed by the "a" variant,
and the "b" variant, do you think?

Trevor



https://codereview.appspot.com/127000043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely
File Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/127000043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely#newcode1891
Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely:1891: @cindex tom tom,
floor
Rather than having all the drum index entries
listed as above, which means they will appear
as consecutive entries in the index do you not
think it better to have a single entry
@cindex drums, various
followed by individual entries like
@cindex acoustic bass drum
@cindex bass drum
etc, so providing a wider range of matches to
possible lookups?
Same for all the other entries.

https://codereview.appspot.com/127000043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely#newcode2038
Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely:2038: @code{ridecymbal
@* cymcr @*}
should be "cymr"

https://codereview.appspot.com/127000043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely#newcode2059
Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely:2059: @code{ridecymbals
@* cymrb @*}
"ridecymbalb"

https://codereview.appspot.com/127000043/